The Impact of AI and Employment Law
By: Amir GhahremanIn this blog post we will discuss certain issues arising from the intersection of AI and employment law. These include the potential for job duty modifications, implementing AI-related workplace policies, and legislative trends in response to the growing use of AI systems.
AI and Employment Law
The increased use of artificial intelligence at organizations raises both existing and fresh legal issues in employment law. AI is a new form of technology but does not represent the first time that technology affecting the workplace has been introduced.
Existing Issues
Two existing issues arising from this new technology include workplace modifications due to increased use of AI in organizational processes and implementing AI-related workplace policies.
Just as the adoption of computers and smartphones resulted in certain workplace modifications, so will the use of AI, resulting in changes to how employees perform many tasks and therefore requiring employers to manage any workplace modifications in accordance with employment laws. New technologies also often require new workplace policies governing their usage so the important actions for employers will be to design reasonable policies regarding workplace AI usage and then to properly implement such policies.
New Issues
New issues arise from AI-specific legislation and certain inherent risks in using AI, particularly the risks of bias in AI systems. AI systems can be biased in their decision-making due to biased training data and/or programming errors. Compounding these risks is the fact that it can be more difficult to detect or identify these biases in AI systems in comparison to purely human-made decisions.
Governments are aware of these risks and have begun to enact legislation to address them.
BC has not yet enacted AI-specific legislation applicable to employment law however we can look to Ontario and farther abroad for indications of what will likely follow in BC. Ontario’s Working for Workers Four Act, 2024 specifically addresses artificial intelligence in the hiring process by amending the Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000 to require employers to disclose the use of AI in the screening, assessment or selection process for applicants to a job position, effective January 1, 2026.
Although the Ontario rules will only initially require disclosure of AI use, the EU and certain states in the US are already subject to significantly more detailed AI legislation which go beyond the hiring process. These are relevant not only because they will likely impact how Canadian jurisdictions will proceed with their future legislation, but also because such EU and US legislation will already apply to Canadian-based employers who use AI with respect to any employees they may have in such foreign jurisdictions.
Going forward, we are likely to see increasingly detailed AI-specific legislation which will impact BC employers at the hiring stage and beyond.
Key Takeaway for Employers
Employers should make efforts to remain current on developments in AI-specific legislation both in their home jurisdiction and in any other jurisdictions where they may have employees or in which they may be recruiting. Employers should adopt and properly communicate their policies regarding AI use by employees and manage any job modifications or employment terminations in accordance with applicable employment laws.
For a more in-depth article on AI issues in Employment Law, click here: The Impact of AI and Employment Law
If you would like more information on this topic, or require assistance with drafting AI policies for your workplace, please contact any member of our Employment and Human Rights Group.
-
The Canada Emergency Response Benefit (“CERB”) was introduced by the federal government in response to the pandemic in 2020. The program provides financial support to Canadians impacted directly by COVID-19. Terminated employees frequently ask whether these CERB payments are deductible from wrongful dismissal damages. In this post, we reviewed two recent BC Supreme Court decisions where the Court found that the payments were deductible, in particular, the CERB payments “raise a compensating advantage” issue. If the CERB payments were not deducted, the plaintiff would be in a better position than he/she would have been if there had been no breach of the employment contract.
-
As of March 17, 2020, the BC Government has announced a public health emergency under the Public Health Act, and on March 23rd, 2020 the BC Government enacted an amendment to the BC Employment Standards Act specifically directed to granting “job protected” leaves for BC employees impacted by COVID-19.
