Paid Sick Leave for BC Employees Starting January 1, 2022

By: Georg Reuter

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Our Employment & Human Rights Lawyers have been fielding many questions from clients regarding the recent announcement by the provincial government that starting in January, employers will be required to provide 5 paid sick days to BC employees. Here are responses to those questions:

The start date for the new 5 sick days is January 1, 2022, and new employees are eligible for the 5 sick days after 90 days of employment;
The 5 paid sick days are in addition to the current 3 unpaid sick days, for a total of 8 sick days (5 paid and 3 unpaid) per year;
If employers currently have a sick day policy that meets or exceeds the new 5 paid sick day requirements, we recommend they add wording to clarify that the paid sick days under an existing policy include the paid sick leave required by the BC Employment Standards Act (the “ESA”). This will avoid “doubling up” on sick days;
Employers can ask for “reasonably sufficient proof” of an employee being sick. This may include in some cases , asking for a doctor’s note;
Paid sick days only apply to employees – they do not extend to employees taking time off to care for a sick family member. There are however other provisions of the ESA which provide unpaid leave for employees who need to take time off to care for family members;
It appears that unused sick days:
- don’t carry over from year to year; and
- may not have to be paid out on termination;
The new sick day provisions will not apply to:
- employees working in the Federally-regulated sector; and
- employees in professions or occupations excluded from the ESA;

For more information about this post, or if you require support updating your policies, email Employment & Human Rights Lawyer, Georg D. Reuter at greuter@rbs.ca, or call at 604.661.9208.

About Georg Reuter

Georg Reuter is a partner and the practice leader for the Employment and Human Rights Group. He is also a member of the Advanced Education and Research Practice Group, and has over 25 years of experience in the areas of employment and human rights law, as well as intellectual property and licensing law, with a particular focus on the transfers of new technologies from academic institutions to business.

Read this next:

Mandatory Covid Vaccine Policy: Reasonable? Or Constructive Dismissal? BC Supreme Court Weighs In

Reading Time: 5 minutes

Parmar v. Tribe Management Inc., 2022 BCSC 1675 is the first civil court decision to tackle whether an unpaid leave of absence for noncompliance with an employer’s mandatory vaccination policy can be considered constructive dismissal. The issue before the Court was whether Tribe Management Inc.’s decision to place Ms. Parmar on an unpaid leave of absence was reasonable following the implementation of a mandatory vaccination policy given the circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic at the time. Ms. Parmar refused to be vaccinated due to choice. She did not apply to her employer to be exempt from the mandatory vaccination policy based on medical or religious reasons. The BC Supreme Court found that it was not a constructive dismissal. Instead, it found that Ms. Parmar had repudiated the employment contract. As a result, the claim was dismissed, and Ms. Parmar was not entitled to any damages.
Are You Ever Off the Clock? Termination for Off-Duty Conduct

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Employers can discipline and, in some cases, dismiss employees for off-duty conduct. The question is how bad does the conduct have to be? In the recent BC Supreme Court decision of Klonteig v. West Kelowna (District), 2018 BCSC 124, the judge found that the District (the employer) should not have terminated Mr. Klonteig for cause after he was given a 90 day administrative driving prohibition while off duty.

BC Workplace Blog