A Reminder To Terminated Employees: Yes – You Must Take Reasonable Steps to Find New Employment, Or Else…
By: Michelle QuinnIn Okano v. Cathay Pacific Airways Limited, 2022 BCSC 881, the plaintiff, Frances Okano, (“Ms. Okano”) was terminated from her employment at Cathay Pacific Airways Limited (“Cathay”) on December 11, 2020, after thirty-five years of service. She was sixty-one years of age at the time of termination, and held a middle management position.
She had spent her entire working career at Cathay.
One issue before the Court was whether Ms. Okano had failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate her loss during the reasonable notice period.
Her evidence before the Court was that she did nothing to search for new employment prior to February 2021. Ms. Okano created a résumé and started searching various online job sites for openings. She received several notifications and alerts of job postings, however, she considered that none of them were suitable for a person of her skill set.
Interestingly, Ms. Okano chose not to apply for any jobs in the airline industry because it was not “in her” anymore. From her perspective, she felt entitled, after thirty-five years, to go down a different career path. She was not interested in going back into travel or the airline industry.
By the time of trial, Ms. Okano had applied for fifty positions and attended eight interviews, none of which resulted in an offer of employment.
Ultimately, the Court found that Ms. Okano did not take reasonable steps to find alternative employment, and stated that her attempts to find new employment can best be described as “passive”.
The following are key passages from the Court:
The Court awarded Ms. Okano twenty-four months of reasonable notice (salary) with a reduction of three months on account of her failure to mitigate her losses.
If you have been terminated and need advice, or have any questions about this decision and mitigation generally, please contact Michelle Quinn, Partner, in the Employment and Human Rights Group at mquinn@rbs.ca or call at 604.661.9229.
-
Is it appropriate to make surreptitious recordings in the workplace, so long as one party to the conversation consents? According to a recent BC Supreme Court decision, the answer is “No”. In Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, the Court found that Mr. Shalagin’s conduct in surreptitiously recording his colleagues constitutes just cause given the effect of the relationship of trust. The employee knew his actions were wrong, if not legally, at least ethically.
-
Workplaces are recognizing more than ever that our gender is not the same as the sex assigned to us at birth. This refreshing shift in realization has brought about an increase in personal pronouns being added by professionals to email signatures and/or social media bios, leadership sharing their views on the importance of language in our workplace, and encouragement of more visible pronoun use within our organizations.
